Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Volver al inicio

Arriba

comentarios

DraftKings Logo Comes Down at World Series of Poker Before Live November Nine Broadcast



This DraftKings logo won’t be worn by November Niner Max Steinberg when WSOP returns to your Rio for the airing of the table that is final ESPN. The daily fantasy sports operator cut relations using the World Series of Poker, and asked that its logo be taken off the broadcast.

DraftKings, which during last summer’s World Series of Poker (WSOP) seemed to be reigning high and proud, will not be seen in the upcoming final table broadcast on ESPN.

WSOP will land all eyes regarding the poker world November that is beginning 8 since the November Nine commences survive ESPN. The Rio will welcome back the Main Event’s nine finalists for a prize of $7,680,021 waiting for the winner. But DraftKings are going to be a no-show.

The honor and achievement of going to the November Nine is an experience that is life-altering but DraftKings has respectfully asked the WSOP to eliminate its signage and branding from the event and terminate its sponsorship contract immediately.

The fantasy that is daily (DFS) operator is embroiled in a legal and public opinion struggle throughout the last month as its contests have come under fire and even FBI scrutiny.

Speaking with respect to the WSOP and its parent business Caesars, Vice President of Corporate Communications for Caesars Interactive Entertainment Seth Palansky said DraftKings ‘asked us to cease any sponsorship activities … and we complied.’

What is Complete is completed

Pre-taped protection of the Main Event in has been airing since September 14 on ESPN july. As with this DraftKings’ presence is still heavily felt, its logos surrounding the room and strategically placed on the, well, felt week.

Though Caesars will remove the posters and banners for the 3 times of November broadcasts, little can likely be done for what’s recently been shot.

DFS operators are tactically attempting to distance themselves from poker and gambling as politicians, attorneys, and media pundits deliberate on whether the contests that are weekly gambling or are skill-based activities. DraftKings and competing FanDuel argue it’s the latter.

That wasn’t always the case, with DraftKings CEO Jason Robins as soon as explaining his platform as a mashup between traditional dream leagues and poker.

Just What About Max?

November Niner Max Steinberg is going to be seated during the final table. The 27-year-old turned $27 on DraftKings into a $10,000 Main Event entry via a satellite contest.

The win that is big the daily fantasy platform required Steinberg to sport the DraftKings logo on their apparel, which they can be seen wearing on ESPN during his ascent up the leaderboard. But come next month, Steinberg won’t be displaying the DFS emblem.

DraftKings cut ties with the WSOP, and evidently also with Steinberg. ‘I am not affiliated with DraftKings,’ Steinberg tweeted on 21 october.

Steinberg heads into the November Nine in the center of the pack in 5th with 20.2 million chips.

The folding of DraftKings in the World Series of Poker has created more conversation on poker’s marquee event compared to the real tournament itself. That would be due to Joe McKeehen’s commanding big stack lead, his 63.1 million potato chips accounting for 32.8 % associated with the total in play.

Many poker fans and activities enthusiasts in general have had enough of hearing about daily dream recreations.

The onslaught of television commercials from DraftKings and FanDuel over the year that is last and now the subsequent coverage for the daily fantasy legal discourse has resulted in a rather negative public viewpoint among outsiders.

94-year-young William Wachter might best have said it during in 2010′s Main Event. When asked what he desired to say to all the players at the Rio, Wachter responded, ‘Shut up and deal.’

Studio City Macau Opens with Hollywood A-Listers in Attendance

Mariah Carey and James Packer celebrate the opening that is grand of City Macau. Carey is rumored to have now been paid $1 million for her set. (Image: theaustralian.com.au)

Studio City, Macau, James Packer’s new $4.5 billion integrated casino resort regarding the Cotai Strip, finally flung open its doorways on Tuesday night having a little help from the billionaire casino mogul’s squeeze that is latest, Mariah Carey.

Carey is rumored to possess been compensated $1 million for belting out her back catalogue as the likes of Robert De Nero and Leonardo DiCaprio mingled among the audience regarding the opening night.

Not just is the TV and movie-themed Studio City the only casino to mingle tv and film manufacturing facilities because of the conventional shopping, gaming and hotel attractions, but additionally it is the only turn to come having its own Scorsese-directed short movie, starring the aforementioned and Brad Pitt.

The evening marked the premiere of the movie that is 15-minute entitled The Audition, for that the stars had been rumored royal vegas casino no deposit bonus to have pocketed around $10 million each.

‘It’s the coolest 15 minutes ever made,’ Packer assured a press conference earlier.

Burst Bubble

A time of unprecedented growth when investors must have felt that the bubble would never burst for all the glitz, Studio City was conceived in a very different economic climate from the one Macau knows today.

2 yrs ago Forbes declared Macau to be among the globe’s fastest-growing economies. Its casinos had been taking every two months what Las Vegas was consuming a 12 months.

But Chinese President Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption drive has halted the success story and delivered profits tumbling for 16 straight months.

‘ I don’t think some of the operators could have predicted what has happened now,’ Packer told CNBC recently. ‘As A australian investor in China and Macau, it is extremely hard to be critical of a corruption crackdown… [but] when and how that ends is something that nobody knows.’

Studio City was conceived by US investment companies Silver Point Capital LP and Oaktree Capital Management LLC and Hong Kong’s eSun Holdings Ltd, but bitter legal wrangles between the many investors delayed its construction.

Packer and Lawrence Ho’s Melco Crown stepped in 2011, gaining a controlling 60 percent stake within the property and construction work resumed.

Packer Upbeat

Melco Crown had hoped to receive the blessing of this Macau government for 400 gaming tables regarding the casino floor, that will be the quantity it says it takes to make the venture profitable, however it ended up being announced last week that the company would receive just 250.

Macau has been sparring featuring its dining table allocations in present months, bowing to pressure from Beijing, which wants the gambling hub to concentrate on creating more non-gambling related amenities.

Despite the setback Packer continues to be upbeat in regards to the long-term future of Macau: ‘The long-lasting picture that is macro Macau continues to be incredibly exciting,’ he said. ‘I think we’ve all got to be mindful of the fact this has been a terrific ride so far, and absolutely nothing is really a straight line up.’

William Hill Voice Activated Betting App Cleared by Aussie Police

Tom Waterhouse, William Hill’s Australian chief, insists that the company’s application, which exploits a loophole Australia’s gaming legislation, is entirely legal. (Image: Daniel Pleming)

William Hill Australia and other licensed operators have gained a crucial victory in their battle to offer in-play mobile betting to Australian customers.

The Australian Federal Police (APF) told William Hill this week that it could not be launching an research to the legality for the company’s controversial ‘Click to Call’ betting app.

Top metal at William Hill have always asserted that the Click to Call service is perfectly legal, but in August the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) begged to differ, accusing the bookmaker of exploiting a grey loophole that is legal.

Unable to introduce unique investigation that is criminal it referred William Hill, as well as Bet365, Ladbrokes, along with other operators whose apps mirror the service, towards the authorities accusing them of being in breach associated with nation’s gambling laws.

‘Great Outcome for Aussie Punters’

Australia’s Interactive Gambling Act 2011 stipulates that in-game bets must be put in-person or by telephone.

Simply Click to Call and its particular imitators neatly skirt the issue by using voice recognition technology that enables bettors to confirm their wagers using a simple sound command.

The function has been in operation since and was quickly followed into the market by copycat apps from other operators april. Ladbrokes suspended its variation complaints that are following the media regulator, but may very well be emboldened to resume the service.

‘William Hill has gotten confirmation that is formal the Australian Federal Police won’t be investigating the complaints introduced to it by the Australian correspondence and Media Authority regarding its ‘In-Play’ product that allows customers to bet live within a game with just several taps,’ said Tom Waterhouse, William Hill’s Australian chief.

‘ This will be a great outcome for Australian punters who will not have to bet in-play via illegal offshore bookmakers which pose a huge threat to both consumer protection and the integrity of Australian sport.’

Review Underway

The actual situation has now been passed back in to the ACMA, which told Fairfax Media so it remains concerned about the continuation of the service.

‘Notwithstanding the AFP’s choice, the ACMA remains concerned with the potentially prohibited internet gambling content complained of and may refer future complaints about comparable Australian hosted content towards the AFP,’ it said.

Overview of the Interactive Gaming Act is underway in Australia as lawmakers seek to figure out whether its statutes have failed to steadfastly keep up with the fast-paced changes in the way in which customers connect to sports operators that are betting.

Many of whom offer in-play betting to Australian customers with impunity, as lawmakers attempt to estimate the true scale of the problem under scrutiny will be the detrimental economic impact of unlicensed, offshore websites.

Object moved

Object moved to here.